Reward-based · backed by research

Train your dog with the science, not the shouting.

Take the free 1-minute quiz — we'll pinpoint your dog's #1 challenge and email you a reward-based starting plan built straight from peer-reviewed behaviour science.

Free quiz →

Free · 4 questions · ~1 min · plan emailed to you

Always freePeer-reviewed scienceReward-based onlyNo shock collars
Happy dog running outdoors

Reward-based training isn't the "soft" option — it's the evidence-based one

For decades, dog training was sold as a battle for dominance: be the "alpha," correct hard, never let the dog "win." Modern behaviour science has quietly dismantled that story. When researchers actually compare methods, reward-based training comes out as effective as — or more effective than — aversive methods, with markedly better welfare outcomes for the dog.1,3

This isn't wishful thinking. It's the weight of the peer-reviewed evidence.

What the research actually found

Dogs trained with aversive methods — leash corrections, shock and prong collars, "alpha rolls" — show more stress-related behaviour and physiological signs of stress than dogs trained with rewards.1 In a controlled study of electronic ("shock") collars, the e-collar offered no advantage over reward-based training and was associated with more stress-related behaviour during training.2 A broad review of aversive methods reached the same conclusion: the costs to welfare are real, and the upside over reward-based training simply isn't there.3

"You have to dominate your dog" is a myth. Dominance/alpha theory came from a flawed captive-wolf study that the original researcher himself later walked back. Modern behaviour science does not support it. You build cooperation by being the most rewarding, predictable, trustworthy thing in your dog's world.

The four challenges almost every owner hits

Most "bad behaviour" falls into one of four buckets — and each has a reward-based fix that works with your dog's emotions instead of suppressing them:

  • Leash reactivity & pulling — big emotions at triggers, fixed by counterconditioning below threshold
  • Separation anxiety — genuine panic when alone, fixed by gradual sub-threshold desensitisation
  • Recall — a reinforcement-history problem, rebuilt with high-value rewards and a long line
  • Adolescence — a real neurological phase, managed with consistency, not dominance

The quiz you're about to take

Answer 4 quick questions and we'll pinpoint your dog's #1 challenge, then email you a free, reward-based starting plan built from the research. About a minute. Your answers are never shown publicly — your plan is sent straight to your inbox.

Find your dog's #1 challenge

Most owners are sold suppression and dominance. The science says reward-based works as well or better — with far better welfare.

Take the free quiz →

Frequently asked questions

Is reward-based training actually backed by science?

Yes. Peer-reviewed studies consistently find that reward-based methods are as effective or more effective than aversive ones, with better welfare outcomes. Dogs trained with aversive methods show higher stress-hormone (cortisol) levels and more 'pessimistic' emotional states (Vieira de Castro et al., 2020; Ziv, 2017).

Are shock collars and prong collars bad for dogs?

The weight of the evidence points to reward-based training. Controlled research found e-collar training offered no advantage over reward-based training and was associated with more stress-related behaviour (Cooper et al., 2014). We use and recommend reward-based methods only.

Do I need to be the 'alpha' or 'pack leader'?

No. Dominance/alpha theory came from a flawed captive-wolf study that its own original researcher later walked back. Modern behaviour science does not support it. You build cooperation by being the most rewarding, predictable, trustworthy thing in your dog's world.

Is the quiz free and private?

Yes. The diagnostic quiz is completely free and takes about a minute. We email your personalised, reward-based starting plan — your answers are never shown publicly.

Scientific references

  1. Vieira de Castro, A. C., Fuchs, D., Morello, G. M., Pastur, S., de Sousa, L., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2020). Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0225023.
  2. Cooper, J. J., Cracknell, N., Hardiman, J., Wright, H., & Mills, D. (2014). The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward based training. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e102722.
  3. Ziv, G. (2017). The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs—A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 19, 50–60.

Ready to go deeper?

Your complete reward-based training plan is on Pup Class.

Step-by-step programs for leash reactivity, separation anxiety, recall and more — all reward-based, all built from the research. Thousands of dogs already calmer.

Visit Pup Class →